ArchivedThis is the Foundation’s public site as it stood to 2026, retained under DAYBOOK and no longer maintained. Figures and programme states are correct as at their publication date. Return to the current site.
The Mars FoundationEstablished 2000 · Non-profit NP-2000-41187
Mission and governance

One sentence, filed in 2000, never amended

The Foundation exists to do a single thing, and to say publicly what it learns while trying. Everything below — the divisions, the award process, the accounts, the buildings — is machinery in service of one clause that the board cannot rewrite.

Registration NP-2000-41187Filed 14 March 2000Accounts audited annually
Articles of the Foundation, clause 2
To advance, by patient and unglamorous means, the establishment of a permanent human presence beyond this planet; and to publish, without embargo or exception, everything it learns in the attempt.
Adopted 14 March 2000 · unamended · alterable only by unanimous resolution of the board with the founder present
What that means in practice

We buy the part of a mission nobody photographs

A crewed crossing is not held up by ambition. It is held up by seals that gall in vacuum, coatings that darken under electrostatically held dust, a scrubber that fails on the ninth morning, and a bearing specification nobody wants to write. The Foundation funds those, and has since before it was a foundation.

It does not operate spacecraft. Where an instrument can fly on somebody else’s vehicle it flies on somebody else’s vehicle, which costs roughly two orders of magnitude less and returns the same numbers. Between 2004 and 2021 that arrangement gave us a site survey of seventeen years’ depth without owning a single lander.

It does not campaign for money. The Foundation was endowed at filing and its fundraising line has read zero every year since. Nothing on this site takes a payment, and nothing ever will.

And it does not hurry. No programme is assessed on a horizon shorter than eight years, because a schedule that cannot survive four transfer windows is not a schedule. The record is public, including the four years in which we committed nothing at all.

P·01

Publish everything

Every result the Foundation pays for is published without embargo, without a paywall and without a patent held back. This has been a condition of award since before the Foundation existed; it is why we have never had to ask anybody for data.

P·02

Own as little as possible

The Foundation builds instruments and gives them away. It does not operate spacecraft it could instead fly on, and it does not buy a facility a university already has. Ownership is overhead; instruments are the work.

P·03

Measure in decades

No programme is assessed on a horizon shorter than eight years. Nothing in the charter requires an announcement, and the Foundation has never held one. A schedule that survives four transfer windows is worth more than a schedule that reads well.

P·04

Buy instruments, not prestige

The Foundation pays for the part of a mission nobody photographs: the seals, the coatings, the calibration targets, the bearing specification, the second detector that proves the first one. It has declined every naming right offered to it.

Governance

A board that can be voted against, and accounts that can be read

The Foundation is governed by a board of eight, chaired by the founder. Six seats are held by people who were grantees before they were governors; two are held for endowment and ethics. A quorum is five. The founder holds one vote and no reserved power beyond the chair.

Awards are decided by a panel of the Director of Research and four external reviewers, rotated every two rounds. Panel members abstain on anything touching their own institution, which in a field this small happens often enough that the abstention register is published with the awards.

The accounts are audited annually and published in full, including the years in which the Foundation underspent its plan. No programme has ever been funded out of a subsequent year’s income.

Standing refusals

  • Naming rights, of any kind, on any article, facility or result.
  • Exclusive access to data the Foundation has paid for.
  • Retained intellectual property, including on parts that ship commercially.
  • Publication embargoes, including short ones, including at a journal’s request.
  • Compensation for any officer tied to a launch outcome.

The officers and the board are listed here →

Summary of the 2026 audited accounts
Endowment at filing, 14 March 20001,200m credits
Endowment, current valuation6,940m credits
Disbursed since filing4,180m credits
Committed, 2027–2035 windows9,600m credits
Grants awarded since filing512awards
Institutions funded141in 31 jurisdictions
Programme spend as share of outgoings94.1per cent
Administration and governance4.6per cent
Fundraising0.0per cent
Naming rights sold since 19510none offered, none accepted

Sums in credits. Percentages of total outgoings; the residual 1.3 per cent is the archive, which the Foundation declines to count as administration.

Divisions

Eight divisions, and the letters that appear in every grant number

A grant reference is MF, then the division, then the year, then the serial: MF-INS-2004-018 is the eighteenth award of 2004, made by Instrumentation. Records predating the Foundation carry a PR reference and were catalogued in 2001.

INS

Instrumentation

COM

Computation and modelling

SUR

Surface survey

MAT

Materials and in-situ resources

LIF

Life support and closed systems

MED

Human physiology, long duration

PRO

Propulsion, power and structures

ARC

Archive and publication

Facilities

Four sites, three of them leased

The Foundation owns as little as it can. It holds a lease on the Aldern Works, a lease on the Cold Lab, and long-standing support arrangements with two institutions it has funded since the 1950s.

The Aldern Works
Drawing office, clean bay, machine shop, archive. Leased since 2000.
Wraith Basin, Aldern County
The Cold Lab
Closed-ecology enclosures; HEARTHSTONE. Four sealed volumes, 31 m³ to 640 m³.
Wraith Basin north site
Kestrel Flats Observatory
Atmospheric monitoring and the opacity series. Foundation-supported since 1958.
Kestrel Flats
Hallowell Optical Works
Optics and calibration standards. Supported, in one form or another, since 1954.
Hallowell

Flight hardware is built under contract at Sablefield Aerospace Works. The Foundation holds no share in it and competes the work each programme.